Posts
Jew "Professor" Noel Ignatiev hatesthe White race. This deranged leftist
runs an Anti-White website calling for
the destruction of the White race.
One can only imagine the shrieks of
Nazism, if the same was
called on for Jews !
"Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live
ones, and the females, too, until the social construct
known as the white race is destroyed. Not
deconstructed, but destroyed."
Noel Ignatiev, Jewish Harvard professor and
editor of Race Traitor magazine
(Washington Times, September 4, 2002)
Originally published -September 04, 2002
Harvard Hates The White Race?
Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about stamping
out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?
College students will tell you that a university education today is a guilt trip
for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from appreciating and absorbing
their own culture and to make it difficult for whites to resist the unreasonable
demands (quotas, reparations, etc.) from “people of color.”
To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate
answers: “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”
Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the anti-white
propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who is aware
tells them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to make a point.
Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s
W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is
the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto, “treason to
whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”
The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”
At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide for
whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of the program. A
statement by the editors on the web site says that the new abolitionists
“do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of
protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining
their goal.”
Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:
“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable
that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any
opposition other than from committed white supremacists.”
Thus does he put whites on notice. If they oppose their
abolition, they are “white supremacists.”
According to Dr. Ignatiev,
“The key to solving the social problems of our age is to
abolish the white race.”
“Make no mistake about it,” he says,
“we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the
live ones, and the females too, until the social construct
known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’
but destroyed.”
What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim?
Asian? What about Jewish?
The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish
intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a cultural
and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish homeland, and Israelis seem
determined to keep it that way. Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli
university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race?
Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in their homelands
should be abolished.
Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he received
two graduate degrees.
Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu] is showcased
in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial
at Harvard, because it is the business of American universities.
A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is not the privilege of being admitted
to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance requirements. It is not the
privilege of being hired independently of ability because of government enforced
racial quotas. It is not the privilege of being able to sue whites and “white companies”
if blacks are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the privilege
of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue if a white replies in kind.
The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they are superior
and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the white race.
I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this white
loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists and radical feminists are white. Whites
disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite widespread opposition
to quotas, neither “white” political party will act to stop unconstitutional quotas,
which have made a mockery of equality under law. Whites are inundated by massive
non-white immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain
immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.
But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must go. The
communists said it was a guilty class that had to go.
If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be apprised
that today genocide has a home in the educational system.
